About the Nation Rifle, I wasn't here for the first go-around so I'm not really sure what happened. What I do know is that there was a lot of time and effort put into it, in the end there were a lot of people that weren't happy with what was offered, and I believe 12 people bought the rifle. I am more than happy to hear how we can do it better if we were to do another one. How do we get everyone to agree on one rifle, or at least compromise on one? Maybe we should develop a 6.5 since that's what everybody here seems to want. Who's in for that idea?
When the topic came up I figured it would be best left alone, but since a Weatherby rep has taken interest I'll put my 2 cent in. I wasn't here for the first WNMR either. I joined the nation right about the time they were taking orders, saw the post, but really had no clue what it was about, or interest since I had made up my mind to order a vannie in .300 Wby Mag from the custom shop. But from the outside looking in, it seemed like one platform and caliber wasn't enough to please everybody. Seems like the timing also caught some folks that would've gladly bought it with empty pockets and no time to scrape together the money. .
I also have to wonder, is a mere 12 rifles sold really as much a "failure" as it seemed? At the time I'm writing this, there are 76,668 members, 146 of which are online. 9 members, 137 guests. Even if we assume that all of those guests are registered members that didn't sign in, that's still a pretty small number of folks that are lurking around. It's a pretty small community of regulars, and just looking at the numbers available without knowing the actual daily/weekly traffic numbers for the site, one could say selling 12 rifles without any marketing aside from posting on the Nation was a success. And I think it would've been a bigger one if the period for taking orders was perhaps a little bit longer.
Just a thought, but is there's a way to send a mass e-mail to all the Nation members to include those that are registered, but don't seem to find the time to login as regularly as others? I've also seen a few folks mention here and there that they simply didn't know until it was too late.
Here's another off the cuff idea. Maybe instead of burning time with polls, suggestions, and the like, talk to Ed and Dan to see what's feasible, lay out a couple of offerings, then put 'em up for a vote and go with the winner. Might help nip some of the problems associated with design-by-committee in the bud.
Personally though, so far as the 6.5/.264 goes I reckon I'm a neutral party. It doesn't get me particularly excited, but I'm not heavily against it either. Seems like a tall order though, debuting a new cartridge in concert with a WNMR. I'd rather see a 26" barrel to a 24", but I don't figure it's a deal breaker either way. Can't swear that I'll bite until the details are ironed out, but the last time this topic came up I started putting money aside just in case, and miraculously enough I still have it.