Spike Camp

Shooting Illustrated long range loads article

zonie

Re: Shooting Illustrated long range loads article
« Reply #15 on: October 31, 2019, 11:45:03 PM »
As far as long range hunting (not target shooting) about the only time my son and I take extra long shots excluding varmit shooting is Coues deer hunting as an example.  Other big game elk size of course more powerful cartridges would most likely be used. I know guy's who commonly use 30-378's for long range Coues deer which is just slightly over kill but there is a reason they use them and other larger calibers/magnums that fly well at long ranges.  It was a bust for my son  this year only seen 1 Coues buck at 600 yds and then he was gone, they don't call them the gray ghost for no reason.  Generally where we hunt it's cactus, rocks, very heavy brush/vegetation ,  these little german shepard size Coues deer if you ain't seen them they tend to hold tight like a Mearns quail.  Long shots are normal  commonly taken across canyons or in ravines up hill and down hill in some of the most  god awful rough country you would ever want to hunt in,  and  then in the early season it's rattle snake country, we've had friends damn near sit on them,  some dogs have been bitten,  that's an expensive proposition.  Anyway in a different hunt  unit next to our unit 3 friends hunted Coues all 3 were using  Ruger all american 6.5 creedmoor,  3 Coues one at 500 yds, one at 550 yds and one at 600 yds.   Past years other friends and their kids have taken Coues using 6.5x06 custom rifles purpose built, some other calibers and most recently 6.5 creedmoor's with one of the daughters taking her deer at 700 yds and I know of others that have taken Coues at a lot longer ranges.  These are not run of the mill hunters  they have  very accurate guns set up using the right scopes & optics,  the right drop charts &  ballistic programs, a lot of shooting practice,   glassing long distances is the norm.   For a less expensive rifle for out of the box accuracy that little Ruger all american in 6.5 CM isn't bad.  Our Vanguard  synthetic in 6.5 CM is spot on it's a 1/2 " shooter with 143 grain eldx,  the rifle had to be free floated and glass bedded for me to be happy with the overall consistency from shot to shot and now it's right on. I got tired of big spotting scopes on these kind   of hunts so I went out and bought a little Leupold gold ring 15-30x50mm spotting scope strictly for this type of hunting although for a few more dollars that little Vortex 11x33 Razor is really nice and I think better finer adjustments, both are very light weight and honestly when do you really need more than 30 to 40 power to count points,  most all of us use some type of high power bino's 12 x 50's, 15 x 56's, some 20 x binos and a good pair of lightweight lower power 7 or 8 x  bino's is not a bad idea to carry also  for fast scanning close in.  Anyway for people who have never hunted like this it's  different and not for everyone, you really need at least one other person or better yet 2 other people hunting with you with radios so they can spot and walk you into your downed deer , because at these ranges by yourself you probably won't find it in the brush in the afternoon before the lions,  bears, other predators get to it later that night,  last time that happen a good friend got lost , left the deer in a safe spot he thought and headed back in the right direction with the deer head and next morning when he went back the deer eaten by a mtn lion and basically ate all the good parts, the kitty was probably watching him the whole time.   If you think about it hunting the more open areas 500 yds is kind of the new normal with all the new technology, guns, cartridges, rangefinders, and optics , whereas not that many years ago 300 yds was a pretty long shot.  I look at long range in a couple different ways there are slob hunters no matter what ranges you are into,  if you can't do it, don't want to do it, not willing to take the time to train & practice then don't do it,  but there are those hunters shooting extreme distances  a lot of times due to hunting situations you flat ass cannot get any closer  to your animal,  so who's right the hunter who is a slob hunter that cannot hit a deer at 75 yds or someone who trains at long ranges and a gust of wind blows the shot off  ?    There are a lot of times I just won't shoot for whatever reason, bad set up, wind, don't want to pak it out of a canyon.   Just food for thought  I'm not one to judge I've muffed a few short range shots in my day.  I do think when people get to a certain age getting the animal is just not as important any more and I see that all the time the older I get when old hunting friends just stop hunting because they can't find anyone to go with them,  lose interest or find other things to do.     
« Last Edit: November 01, 2019, 01:08:01 AM by zonie »

Re: Shooting Illustrated long range loads article
« Reply #16 on: November 01, 2019, 06:39:43 AM »
Well, I’m not sure what long range class they were in but 10 rounds in ten minutes is common around here at 600 yards and I shot my 6.5-300 in the hunter class, it shot amazing but I won’t do it again because I don’t believe the barrel would last any time at all. What fun though! I think the best long range competition calibers are the ones that are affordable and dependable. For hunting long range I say a 300 weatherby is king. Affordable and dependable.

Re: Shooting Illustrated long range loads article
« Reply #17 on: November 01, 2019, 08:01:56 AM »
As far as long range hunting (not target shooting) about the only time my son and I take extra long shots excluding varmit shooting is Coues deer hunting as an example.  Other big game elk size of course more powerful cartridges would most likely be used. I know guy's who commonly use 30-378's for long range Coues deer which is just slightly over kill but there is a reason they use them and other larger calibers/magnums that fly well at long ranges.  It was a bust for my son  this year only seen 1 Coues buck at 600 yds and then he was gone, they don't call them the gray ghost for no reason.  Generally where we hunt it's cactus, rocks, very heavy brush/vegetation ,  these little german shepard size Coues deer if you ain't seen them they tend to hold tight like a Mearns quail.  Long shots are normal  commonly taken across canyons or in ravines up hill and down hill in some of the most  god awful rough country you would ever want to hunt in,  and  then in the early season it's rattle snake country, we've had friends damn near sit on them,  some dogs have been bitten,  that's an expensive proposition.  Anyway in a different hunt  unit next to our unit 3 friends hunted Coues all 3 were using  Ruger all american 6.5 creedmoor,  3 Coues one at 500 yds, one at 550 yds and one at 600 yds.   Past years other friends and their kids have taken Coues using 6.5x06 custom rifles purpose built, some other calibers and most recently 6.5 creedmoor's with one of the daughters taking her deer at 700 yds and I know of others that have taken Coues at a lot longer ranges.  These are not run of the mill hunters  they have  very accurate guns set up using the right scopes & optics,  the right drop charts &  ballistic programs, a lot of shooting practice,   glassing long distances is the norm.   For a less expensive rifle for out of the box accuracy that little Ruger all american in 6.5 CM isn't bad.  Our Vanguard  synthetic in 6.5 CM is spot on it's a 1/2 " shooter with 143 grain eldx,  the rifle had to be free floated and glass bedded for me to be happy with the overall consistency from shot to shot and now it's right on. I got tired of big spotting scopes on these kind   of hunts so I went out and bought a little Leupold gold ring 15-30x50mm spotting scope strictly for this type of hunting although for a few more dollars that little Vortex 11x33 Razor is really nice and I think better finer adjustments, both are very light weight and honestly when do you really need more than 30 to 40 power to count points,  most all of us use some type of high power bino's 12 x 50's, 15 x 56's, some 20 x binos and a good pair of lightweight lower power 7 or 8 x  bino's is not a bad idea to carry also  for fast scanning close in.  Anyway for people who have never hunted like this it's  different and not for everyone, you really need at least one other person or better yet 2 other people hunting with you with radios so they can spot and walk you into your downed deer , because at these ranges by yourself you probably won't find it in the brush in the afternoon before the lions,  bears, other predators get to it later that night,  last time that happen a good friend got lost , left the deer in a safe spot he thought and headed back in the right direction with the deer head and next morning when he went back the deer eaten by a mtn lion and basically ate all the good parts, the kitty was probably watching him the whole time.   If you think about it hunting the more open areas 500 yds is kind of the new normal with all the new technology, guns, cartridges, rangefinders, and optics , whereas not that many years ago 300 yds was a pretty long shot.  I look at long range in a couple different ways there are slob hunters no matter what ranges you are into,  if you can't do it, don't want to do it, not willing to take the time to train & practice then don't do it,  but there are those hunters shooting extreme distances  a lot of times due to hunting situations you flat ass cannot get any closer  to your animal,  so who's right the hunter who is a slob hunter that cannot hit a deer at 75 yds or someone who trains at long ranges and a gust of wind blows the shot off  ?    There are a lot of times I just won't shoot for whatever reason, bad set up, wind, don't want to pak it out of a canyon.   Just food for thought  I'm not one to judge I've muffed a few short range shots in my day.  I do think when people get to a certain age getting the animal is just not as important any more and I see that all the time the older I get when old hunting friends just stop hunting because they can't find anyone to go with them,  lose interest or find other things to do.     
Very well said.

Re: Shooting Illustrated long range loads article
« Reply #18 on: November 01, 2019, 02:07:08 PM »
Lot of good comments here. That list is definitely on the lame side in my opinion too. The first round that came to my mind also is the .338 Lapua, as was mentioned in an earlier post. On another note, being anywhere near a .338 Lapua with a muzzle brake on it is downright awful.
Come and take it.

Re: Shooting Illustrated long range loads article
« Reply #19 on: November 01, 2019, 02:18:13 PM »
The 338 Lapua and 338 Ultra Mag are an interesting example of just this concept. Both are the same as far as performance goes, but the Lapua is known as the long range shooting caliber and the Ultra Mag is the hunting round.

Go figure...
JK

Re: Shooting Illustrated long range loads article
« Reply #20 on: November 01, 2019, 08:50:07 PM »
Lot of good comments here. That list is definitely on the lame side in my opinion too. The first round that came to my mind also is the .338 Lapua, as was mentioned in an earlier post. On another note, being anywhere near a .338 Lapua with a muzzle brake on it is downright awful.

 AS a Greenhorn to big rifles a fellow here hunting wanted me to shoot his .338 Lapua. I shot it with no hearing protection standing along side of a big stack of round bales. Damn, my ears hurt and I flinched every time I pulled a trigger for years.
I can't tame wild women
But I can make tame women wild

Re: Shooting Illustrated long range loads article
« Reply #21 on: November 01, 2019, 09:09:37 PM »
I wonder where things would be without muzzle breaks and recoil springs, etc. I only know a few people that can consistently shoot good groups with a 300 weatherby without a muzzle break and I’m not one of them. About the 3rd round and I’m anticipating the inevitable. I shot a 340 weatherby once without a brake  and could only laugh at how it felt. I was hitting a gong every shot at 800 yards with my 300 wm but my buddy was upset cus he was having trouble keeping the 340 in a paper plate at 100yds. He asked me to shoot it. It only took one round to figure out the problem was we just weren’t man enough for the caliber. How things have changed

zonie

Re: Shooting Illustrated long range loads article
« Reply #22 on: November 01, 2019, 11:39:21 PM »
Personally I think anything to make / help a person shoot better / more accurately is a good thing.  I got a couple 300 Wbys one with a brake and one without,  maybe I'm just not as recoil sensitive as I probably should be.  I've got little 12 ga shotguns that are just horrible to shoot extra heavy turkey loads.  375 H&H's don't bother me too much it's a different type of recoil more of a big push than a snappy rap on the shoulder like other high power rifles, but of course stock design, weight of the gun and a lot of other things make up how we perceive recoil.  Without question brakes are loud and if I wasn't half deaf no doubt it would bother me,  my son hate's them.   My 300 mark V deluxe without a brake  to me not all that violent from the bench and I can handle quite  a few load test's and not be bothered by it, and on the flip side I have a light weight single shot 12 ga camp gun for bears that I mounted a reflex sight on,  and one shot from this gun from the bench using any of the buck shot or slugs,  I'm hurting, this gun stings.  Main reason I even set this gun up was  for a camp gun years ago an older Samoan aquaintenance  was deer hunting with us and needed to take a nature break out from camp and a pretty nice black bear decided to go check him out with his pant's down, so after that happened we kind of took a handgun with us  or grabbed the little 12 ga when on nature breaks,  a lot of black bears in that area.   
« Last Edit: November 01, 2019, 11:51:27 PM by zonie »

Re: Shooting Illustrated long range loads article
« Reply #23 on: November 02, 2019, 09:52:36 AM »
I have a friend who had a 338 Lapua - he broke (cracked actually) his elbow shooting that rifle (long story) and sold it.  I've had my 338 Ultra Mag since the caliber was introduced and it definitely has stout recoil.  That rifle has taught me how to shoot large calibers off the bench though and it is now much more tolerable. 

I haven't taken any really long shots with it, but it is deadly under 400 yards with factory 250 grain Swift A-Frame bullets.  I've even shot prairie dogs with it (just practicing prior to elk season) and it easily drops them with one shot!  :)
JK

Re: Shooting Illustrated long range loads article
« Reply #24 on: November 02, 2019, 12:30:00 PM »
I have a friend who had a 338 Lapua - he broke (cracked actually) his elbow shooting that rifle (long story) and sold it.  I've had my 338 Ultra Mag since the caliber was introduced and it definitely has stout recoil.  That rifle has taught me how to shoot large calibers off the bench though and it is now much more tolerable. 

I haven't taken any really long shots with it, but it is deadly under 400 yards with factory 250 grain Swift A-Frame bullets.  I've even shot prairie dogs with it (just practicing prior to elk season) and it easily drops them with one shot!  :)

 "  I've even shot prairie dogs with it (just practicing prior to elk season) and it easily drops them with one shot!"
  How do you know they just haven't run back down their hole? 
 There would be no sign of them either way. ;) ;D :o
I can't tame wild women
But I can make tame women wild

Re: Shooting Illustrated long range loads article
« Reply #25 on: November 02, 2019, 01:50:12 PM »
Never seen the red line in the sand?

Re: Shooting Illustrated long range loads article
« Reply #26 on: November 04, 2019, 07:03:38 AM »
Lol, that’s awesome. Ya , I know there’s people like you out there, I’ve got a friend that way. I definitely enjoy having muzzle brakes and recoil technology in guns I myself would otherwise not be able to enjoy. It would be fun to have a high dollar long range competition class where muzzle brakes were not allowed to see the difference in holding styles. I’d guess there wouldn’t be very many bipods either in the big calibers. Don’t foresee it happening but it would be interesting to see what calibers would end up in the lead

Re: Shooting Illustrated long range loads article
« Reply #27 on: November 04, 2019, 02:04:16 PM »
In fairness, I bought my .338 Ultra Mag in my “magnum craze” 20s. I’ve aged a few years since then and I’ve gotten over the “bigger is better” philosophy.

My .338 Ultra Mag doesn’t have a muzzle brake, but it does have a mercury recoil reducer in the stock. The recoil is tolerable, but as my father once said “I’ve had a lot of guns kick me a lot less”! 😬

It is a great rifle/caliber for elk out to ~ 400 yards.
JK

Re: Shooting Illustrated long range loads article
« Reply #28 on: November 04, 2019, 11:53:23 PM »
This thread has morphed a bit, but I wanted to add that the .340 Weatherby Magnum is 338 Lapua ballistic performance in 1963. Again almost a quarter of a century ahead of the next ballistic challenge, the .338 Lapua in 1987.

My 340 shoots factory 250gr at 2960-2980fps.

I must say that I do find the rifle tough to shoot really well off the bench. Partially as the drop of a Weatherby stock climbs off the bags / out of the front rest in big calibres. It hovers areound 1.25 MOA and I think it should do better.

The recoil is not too terrible. It is an unbraked Lazermark with a fairly light Leupold. I did weigh it but don't recall exactly, but I guess it is around 9.5 Lbs. I need to have the stock rebedded as I think the previous guy potentially did a strange thing with regard to pressure point on the fairly skinny barrel.

Anyhow, I was just reminded of how far ahead of things Mr Roy Weatherby was, when reading the posts about the LM and UM.
I shoot cases with a belt because I feel the other cartridges need to pull their trousers up.

Re: Shooting Illustrated long range loads article
« Reply #29 on: November 05, 2019, 12:55:23 PM »
Ya, my brother rolls his eyes when I’m pulling the gun down a bit at the bench. Old habit, takes a lot of rounds out of a gun before I find its sweet spot. 300 win mag is my max without a brake to get real good groups. He’s going to try his 257 bee at the next 600 hunter class match. It’s an older vanguard that shoots crazy tight groups at 200 with 110 factories.It doesn’t seem to heat up too bad so we’re going to zero it at 600 and then see what the groups do with 1 minute between rounds. It’s fun when you get the benchrest guys shaking they’re heads watching the recoil. More fun yet to take the pot!