Spike Camp

Rechambering

Rechambering
« on: June 09, 2023, 09:14:37 AM »
With all of the options of the 6.5 chambering I chose a Vanguard in 6.5 x55.  I've been playing with the idea of put an Ackley 40° shoulder on it. All of my research and a 13.9% improvement in performance has had me going about this for a while now. It's the 6.5x 284 performance with 8 to 10 grains less. The barrel life remains the same. Dies are pricey Redding. A very little accuracy difference when fireforming parent cartridge. For about $500 can have this done.

Re: Rechambering
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2023, 11:05:08 AM »
In the late '70s I had my .30-06 re-chambered to .30 Gibbs and a new .25-06 barreled action rebhambered to .257 Ackley.  The .30 Gibbs with 180 gr Partitions was my favorite elk rifle (along with a couple of Shiras moose, a Mountain goat and an Alaskan Caribou) for over 20 years.  About 15 years ago I replaced it with a .300 Weatherby.

The .257 Ackley is still my go to deer and antelope rifle, and it also put 3 Bighorn rams, a Dall ram, a Mountain Caribou, and my 2nd best 6x6 bull elk in my freezer and on my wall.
NRA Endowment Life Member

Re: Rechambering
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2023, 12:43:01 PM »
In the late '70s I had my .30-06 re-chambered to .30 Gibbs and a new .25-06 barreled action rebhambered to .257 Ackley.  The .30 Gibbs with 180 gr Partitions was my favorite elk rifle (along with a couple of Shiras moose, a Mountain goat and an Alaskan Caribou) for over 20 years.  About 15 years ago I replaced it with a .300 Weatherby.

The .257 Ackley is still my go to deer and antelope rifle, and it also put 3 Bighorn rams, a Dall ram, a Mountain Caribou, and my 2nd best 6x6 bull elk in my freezer and on my wall.

Why did you have a 25-06 bbl rechambered to .257 AI. According to the Nosler reloading manual, the 25-06 has a little over 7 gr more powder capacity than the .257 AI? Did you only have a short action available, or did you just want a .257 AI. That last reason is reason enough.

Re: Rechambering
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2023, 08:54:46 AM »
Why did you have a 25-06 bbl rechambered to .257 AI. According to the Nosler reloading manual, the 25-06 has a little over 7 gr more powder capacity than the .257 AI? Did you only have a short action available, or did you just want a .257 AI. That last reason is reason enough.
Simple answer is that I had just read P. O. Ackley's books and he had nothing but praise for the .257 AI.

I did that back in the late '70s.  I had an FFL then and I bought a new Mauser Mark X .25-06 barreled action and had Les Bauska in Kalispell do the rechambering.  Looking back, I probably should have just had the .25-06 rechambered to .25-06 AI.  But over the years my .257 AI has been very good to me and I don't have any complaints about it.
NRA Endowment Life Member

eford

  • *****
  • 3636
    • View Profile
Re: Rechambering
« Reply #4 on: August 17, 2023, 08:11:22 AM »
I seriously considered getting a 257 Ackley. The external ballistics are perfect for deer and pronghorn. Even the "ordinary" 257 Roberts is good, judging from what I heard from some older hunters who wax poetic about its merits.
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, she walks into mine.

Every man needs to know his limits.