I just combine the breaking in shots with the sighting in shots. Start out with the "cheap" Weatherby, $35 a box ammo. If my first shot is twelve high and ten right, do I really need to shoot two more shots for a "group." Nope. Move the crosshairs, clean the barrel. Take the the next shot. I repeat until I am dead on where I want to be; just shooting one shot at a time, and then cleaning. By this point, I am dead on, and then I do the three shot group thing, to see what the rifle will do. I get it broken in to my satisfaction with one box of shells, not two. And with our three .257's, I found that the "cheap" Weatherby ammo with the mystery 100 gr. bullet all shot under an inch. And that load has proven to be lights out on our Central Texas deer and wild pigs. Some people like to test their scope's repeatability (I do not) by "walking the square." If you do that, you can clean between those groups and burn up some more ammo. While watching my Grandfather and Dad as a kid, they essentially broke in their Winchester 94's the same way, but over the course of a couple of years. They were rather stingy with the ammo in those days. Shoot one or two shots before the season to verify open sights, clean gun, shoot two or three deer during the season, usually cleaning the gun after each successful hunt, put the gun up till the next season. Repeat. After four years and one box of shells, they had "broken in" their barrel, and didn't even know it. My Dad's pre-war 94 still shoots great groups for a lever action rifle. Back to modern bolt actions, to me, the cost of one or two boxes of shells is minimal, if it makes my rifle shoot a half inch better. People will spend more than that on an after market trigger, free floating the barrel, bedding the action, lapping the lugs, blueprinting the action, replacing the stock, etc., just to get a little more accuracy. Breaking in the barrel is probably the "cheapest" way to get a little more accuracy. MM